Other Guns
|
|
Tank
and Vehicle Machine Guns
|
| Model 91
(1931) |
The
Model 91 Tank Machine Gun was simply a modified M-11 light machine
gun which used a larger feed hopper with a capacity of 45 6.5mm
rounds, and it was fitted with a 1.5 power optical sight. During
the years of 1932 - 1936 there were 2043 M91s made at Nagoya. |
| Model 97
(1937) |
|
The
Model 97 Tank Machine gun was a 7.7mm weapon which was modified
form of the Czech ZB 26 light machine gun, and it had the
same 20 round magazine capacity of the Czech gun. As with
the M-91, it was fitted with a 1.5 power optical sight. About
18,000 of these guns were made from 1937 to 1944.
Both M91 and M97 had their bipod
accessories and when they were out of their tanks they were
used as ground guns.
|
| Model 92
(1932) Vehicle Machine Gun |
|
This weapon was truly a heavy
machine gun, being in 13.2mm, and this gun was developed by
Nambu. Fewer than 100 of these guns were made; they were made
during the years of 1934 to 1938 and used on the M-97 armored
cars.
|
|
Aircraft
Guns
|
|
In the mid-1930s the Japanese
Army and Navy purchased British Vickers guns in 7.7mm (.303
British service cartridge) and developed these guns to suit
their own purposes. The Army used a semi-rimmed 7.7mm cartridge
and the Navy used the original rimmed British cartridge.
|
| Army Aircraft
Guns |
|
Army aircraft guns included:
The M-89 Fixed Aircraft Machine Gun in 7.7mm Semi-rimmed (Vickers)
|
The M-89 Flexible Aircraft Machine Gun in 7.7mm Semi-rimmed (Nambu)
|
 |
 |
|
The M-1 Fixed Aircraft Machine Gun in 12.7mm (Browning).
Later the Browning gun was developed and made in 20mm, 37mm,
and 57mm.
The M-98 Flexible Aircraft Machine Gun in 7.92mm (German
MG 15 built under license in Japan)
The M-1 Fixed Aircraft Machine Gun in 7.92mm ( a twin
version of the Czech ZB 26 machine gun, with modifications.)
|
| Navy Aircraft
Guns |
|
Navy aircraft guns included:
The M-97 Fixed Aircraft
Machine Gun in 7.7mm Rimmed(.303 British ,Vickers)
The M-92 Flexible Aircraft Machine Gun in 7.7m Rimmed
(Lewis gun)
The M-99 Fixed (also in Flexible form) Aircraft Machine
Gun in 20mm (Oerlikon)
The M-1 Flexible Aircraft Machine Gun in 7.92mm(Navy
's version of the German MG 15 built under license in Japan).
|
|
|
As well, the Army used the German
Mauser MG 151 in 20mm as a fixed gun, and the Navy used fixed
13.2mm Brownings and a license-built version of the German
Rheinmetall MG 131 in 13mm as a flexible weapon. Both the
Army and Navy adopted all most all of the machine gun technology
which was developed before WW II.
During the period of 1940
to 1945 Japan made about 70,000 aircraft. Judging from this
figure, perhaps there were about 400,000 aircraft machine
guns made. At the beginning of the Pacific War the Navy had
the advantage in aircraft weaponry, but in the later part
of the War over the main islands of Japan the Army actively
used larger cannons on their various fighter aircraft. The
loss of Japanese aircraft to American bombing was countless,
but the loss of American B-29 bombers and their crew considerable.
|
|
Guns
for Naval Vessels
|
|
The Navy developed two principal
kinds of anti-aircraft guns for their boats and ships: The
M-93 in 13.2mm and the M-96 in 25mm. In total several tens
of thousands of these guns were made at the Naval Arsenals
at Yokosuka and Toyokawa. A battleship or an aircraft carrier
in the later part of the War mounted about 100 guns each.
Both the M-93 and the M-96 were of the Hotchkiss system.
|
|
Ground
Anti-aircraft Guns
|
|
The Army developed the single-barrel
20mm M-98 automatic cannon. About 2250 of these guns were
made and later this gun appeared in twin-barrel versions as
the M-2 and as the M-4. There were 1512 M-4 guns made. Most
of these guns were used to equip inland bases in Japan.
|
|
Anti-tank
Guns
|
|
The major gun in this category
was the Army's M-97 Semi-Automatic Anti -tank Cannon which
used a 20mm cartridge of smaller size than that used by the
M-98 Anti-aircraft Gun, and which also was used against ground
targets. Total production of the M-97 was about 10,000, and
the gun was made at Kokura Arsenal.
|
|
Paratrooper
Machine Guns
|
|
The Navy paratrooper was equipped
with M-96 light machine guns and with M-38 carbines; the Army
paratrooper was equipped with some take-down M-99 light machine
guns and of course with M-2 take-down rifles.
|
| The M-100
machine pistol ( or sub machine gun) |
|
It
was developed by Nambu in the late 1930s and fewer than 10,000
of the 1944 type were made at Nagoya Arsenal. These weapons
used the blow back system of operation and they were chambered
for the 8mm pistol cartridge; they had 30-round magazines.
@
|
|
|
Japanese parachute troopers
completed some successful missions at the beginning of the
war, even though they were not equipped with adequate weapons.
By late 1944 enough parachute forces had been trained, and
they were well equipped, but the outcome of their use in the
battle for Leyte in Philippines was tragic. The Japanese sent
one hundred thousand troops, including paratroopers, but only
2000 survived.
The Navy imported several
kinds of sub machine guns from Europe during the 1920s, including
the Bergmann MP- 18. The total number of these imported weapons
was 6000. The folding stock M-38 carbines and the different
take-down M-99 rifles probably were converted by the Navy
for their parachute troopers.
|
|
Navy
General Purpose Machine Guns
|
|
In the 1930's the Navy adopted
the Lewis machine gun as an aircraft flexible gun. The Japanese
Navy developed many high technology weapons for the time,
but they were also the last user of the Lewis, which was a
gun of WW I technology.
|
| The Navy
M-92 Lewis Flexible Aircraft Machine Gun |
|
It
was almost identical to the British Lewis, but the cocking
handle of the Japanese gun is on the left side rather than
on the right. These Lewis guns were used for anti-aircraft
fire, as ground weapons, and for boat armament. The total
production of the M-92 Lewis machine gun was about 20,000,
and the gun was made by Toyokawa Arsenal with Aichi-Tokei(clock),
and by Yokosuka Arsenal in 1943 and 1944. With exception of
the left hand side cocking handle, most Japanese-made Lewis
parts are identical with the parts of other foreign-made Lewis
guns and the parts are compatible. The Navy developed the
tri-pod for M-92 Lewis which could change the positions from
the ground to the anti-air very quickly.
|
|
Japanese
Semi-Automatic Rifle Development
|
Japan did not adopt officially
any semi-automatic rifles but several experimental rifles
were made, including a version of the U.S. Garand rifle. In
the late 1920s and early 1930s records show that the Army
Technical Division was keen to acquire Western semi-automatic
rifles to convert to their 6.5mm service cartridge and to
use their standard 5-round clip. They were interested in the
designs of Garand, Pedersen, and in the Czech ZH-29 rifle.
They almost acquired a gas-operated rifle like the Garand,
but they could not acquire a license to build it. Presumably
conditions of cost, supply, and contract restrictions prevented
their acquisition.
Several experimental semi-automatic
rifle models were delivered to Army schools, such as the Tank
School. Just before the end of the War in 1945 all surplus
weapons of this type were gathered and transferred to newly-organized
troops bound for Okinawa. It is possible that many of these
weapons were lost at sea enroute.
The Japanese knew the
U.S. Garand rifle well because they captured several hundred
of them in early 1942 in the Philippine invasion, but records
about how these guns were treated cannot be found. There is
a printed Japanese manual for the U.S. Garand seen so there
should be records. The Navy made a very close copy of the
Garand, with an improved magazine system, in 1944. This weapon
used Japanese rimmed 7.7mm ammunition which was common with
Lewis guns and it had a 10-round capacity magazine; five round
clips were used to load this weapon. (It was probably developed
by the Navy Air Forces which had a lot of stocks of this ammunition.)
Several examples of this weapon exist today. All of them were
roughly made.
It was thought that Japanese
ignored the semi-automatic rifles but every record shows that
they were very keen to develop the weapon. Probably the Model
38 rifle was so highly regarded by them and it was difficult
to find something that overcame the M-38.
|
|
|
|